Bitget CEO: Europe's MiCA Rules and SEPA Integration Key to Challenging US Stablecoin Dominance

Title: Bitget CEO: Europe's MiCA Rules and SEPA Integration Key to Challenging US Stablecoin Dominance

Meta Description: Bitget CEO Gracy Chen analyzes Europe's stablecoin strategy. Can MiCA regulation and SEPA integration close the gap on US dominance? An in-depth look at EURAU, regulatory hurdles, and the path forward.

Introduction: A Global Stablecoin Race with a Clear Leader

The global stablecoin market presents a stark picture of dominance. As of early 2024, U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoins, primarily USDT (Tether) and USDC (Circle), command an estimated 99% of the total market capitalization. This hegemony extends beyond trading pairs into payment rails and institutional finance, embedding the U.S. dollar deeper into the digital asset ecosystem. Meanwhile, other economic powerhouses are mobilizing responses. China continues its methodical rollout of the digital yuan (e-CNY), a central bank digital currency (CBDC). Europe, armed with its landmark Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation and the recent launch of pioneering projects like the BaFin-regulated EURAU, is positioning itself as a third way: a regulated, private-sector alternative centered on the euro.

But can Europe move fast enough to become a credible challenger? In an exclusive conversation with BeInCrypto, Gracy Chen, CEO of leading crypto exchange Bitget, dissected Europe's position. Chen argues that while Europe’s comprehensive regulatory framework provides a critical foundation, its future success hinges on accelerating operational readiness—specifically through the deep integration of compliant euro stablecoins with the region's instant payment systems like SEPA Instant. The race is not just about creating alternatives but about building viable, scalable ecosystems that can attract global capital and users.

Europe vs. US vs. Asia: Diverging Philosophies in Digital Currency

The approaches taken by major economic blocs toward stablecoins reflect deeper philosophical and regulatory differences.

The U.S. "Innovation-First" Model: As Gracy Chen outlined, the United States has largely operated under a lighter-touch, state-by-state regulatory regime for existing stablecoin issuers, coupled with proposed federal frameworks like the GENIUS Act that aim to foster private innovation. This environment allowed entities like Circle and Tether to achieve massive scale and deep integration with traditional finance, including partnerships with Visa and Mastercard. The result is a powerful network effect where liquidity begets more liquidity, cementing USD stablecoins as the de facto settlement layer for crypto.

Asia's CBDC-Centric Path: In contrast, many Asian economies, notably China with its e-CNY pilot, are prioritizing state-controlled digital currencies. Here, private stablecoins play a secondary or heavily restricted role. The focus is on monetary policy control, financial surveillance, and reducing dependency on cross-border dollar systems.

Europe's "Regulation-First" Framework: Europe has chosen a distinct path with MiCA. "Europe is anchored in MiCA, which offers a unified legal framework but demands a high compliance burden," Chen stated. This framework requires issuers to maintain full reserves, hold significant capital, and obtain specific licenses like an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license. The priority is clearly user protection and financial stability, but as Chen notes, this comes at the cost of higher entry barriers and potentially slower growth compared to the less restrictive early days of U.S. stablecoin expansion.

MiCA: A Strong Foundation in Need of Agile Implementation

The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation is arguably the world's most comprehensive crypto-specific regulatory framework. Its provisions for stablecoin issuers—termed "asset-referenced tokens" (ARTs) and "e-money tokens" (EMTs)—set high standards for reserve management, redemption rights, and consumer disclosure.

However, having a rulebook is different from having a thriving market. Chen identifies key adjustments needed for MiCA to truly foster innovation:

  1. Faster Authorization: Streamlining the process for licensing Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) and token issuers across all 27 EU member states is crucial to prevent bottlenecks.
  2. Support for Multi-Bank Models: Encouraging resilient reserve structures, such as the multi-bank model used by EURAU, can mitigate single-point-of-failure risks and enhance systemic stability.
  3. Harmonized National Implementation: MiCA provides the framework, but national regulators (like Germany's BaFin or France's AMF) are responsible for enforcement. Inconsistent interpretation or application could lead to regulatory fragmentation within the single market.

"Without these," Chen warned in her interview with BeInCrypto, "Europe risks regulatory fragmentation and slower adoption."

EURAU: A Case Study in European Regulatory Ambition

The launch of EURAU, recognized as Germany's first BaFin-regulated euro-backed crypto asset, serves as a tangible test case for the MiCA model in action. Its significance is multifaceted.

For Gracy Chen, "EURAU is a pivotal step." It represents more than just another stablecoin; it is a symbol of European monetary sovereignty in the digital age. By offering a fully compliant, euro-denominated alternative to USD stablecoins, it provides a blueprint for other issuers. "Regulatory clarity," Chen added, "is the trigger for institutional adoption and cross-border payment use cases."

EURAU’s structure—with reserves held across multiple EU banks under BaFin oversight—is designed explicitly to meet and exceed MiCA's forthcoming requirements. Its success or failure will be closely watched as a bellwether for whether Europe’s stringent regulatory approach can birth competitive products.

The Critical Path: From Policy Clarity to Operational Readiness

According to Bitget’s CEO, Europe’s most urgent task is shifting from designing rules to enabling seamless function. She outlined several concrete priorities:

  • Native SEPA/TIPS Integration: The top priority is accelerating the development of MiCA-compliant euro stablecoins with built-in integration to SEPA Instant or the TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) system. This would enable "fast, low-cost ramps" between traditional euros and their digital counterparts, dramatically improving user experience.
  • Developing Level-2 Standards & Passporting: Beyond MiCA’s core text, detailed technical standards are needed. Coupled with true EU-wide passporting for licensed issuers and CASPs, this would create a genuinely single market for digital assets.
  • Clarity on Yield-Bearing Products: Explicit rules for tokenized traditional assets, like government bonds or treasury bills, could be a key differentiation point. Europe could create a regulated environment for yield-generating digital assets that remains uncertain in the U.S.
  • Building Unified Infrastructure: Success depends on shared infrastructure: unified fiat on-ramps/off-ramps across exchanges, programs to boost merchant acceptance, technical interoperability rails between different stablecoins and blockchains, and a common supervisory handbook for national regulators.

Chen also proposed a "dedicated stablecoin sandbox and developer toolkits" to attract entrepreneurs and close the innovation gap with more agile markets.

Building Trust: How European Rules Aim to Prevent Past Failures

Trust remains the cornerstone of any stablecoin’s utility. Here, Europe’s regulatory-heavy approach is directly aimed at addressing historical points of failure in the broader crypto market.

Chen pointed to transparency and audited reserves as fundamental. "MiCA’s quarterly reporting requirements help prevent the opacity that led to TerraUSD’s collapse," she noted. The 2022 collapse of TerraUSD (UST), an algorithmic stablecoin without sufficient collateralized reserves, underscored the catastrophic risks of opaque design and insufficient backing.

Furthermore, mandatory Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) integration mandated under broader EU laws like AMLD5/6), combined with requirements for secure, audited smart contracts under MiCA, are designed to provide layered assurance for both institutional entrants and retail users seeking safety.

Strategic Conclusion: A Respectable Player in a US-Dominated Arena

So, can Europe realistically challenge U.S. stablecoin dominance? Gracy Chen provides a measured forecast: "Europe can become a respectable player, but it is unlikely to overtake the US."

The reasoning is grounded in market reality. The United States controls nearly the entire existing market through mature private-sector ecosystems that enjoy immense network effects and deep liquidity. Displacing this incumbency is a monumental task.

Europe’s advantage lies not in replicating that model but in leveraging its unique strength: unprecedented regulatory clarity. For institutional investors and traditional finance entities wary of regulatory uncertainty—a significant factor in the U.S.—Europe’s MiCA framework offers a clear compliance pathway.

The final verdict hinges on execution. As Chen concluded in her interview: "Europe must combine MiCA with speed, infrastructure, and incentives." The region has built the legal runway; now it must empower planes to take off quickly.

What Readers Should Watch Next:

  1. Adoption Metrics for EURAU: Track its market capitalization growth, exchange listings beyond its native ecosystem, and its use in DeFi protocols as indicators of real-world traction.
  2. Speed of MiCA Licensing: Monitor how quickly national regulators like BaFin issue the first full MiCA licenses to CASPs and stablecoin issuers after the regulation's provisions come into force.
  3. Announcements of SEPA Integration: The first partnership between a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin issuer and a major banking/payments provider for native SEPA Instant integration will be a major milestone.
  4. U.S. Regulatory Developments: Progress (or stagnation) on federal U.S. stablecoin legislation will significantly impact Europe’s relative competitive position.

The coming 24-36 months will be definitive. Europe has laid its groundwork with MiCA; now it must prove it can build upon it with the urgency and innovation required to carve out a meaningful share of the future digital money landscape

×